Sunday, July 14, 2013

Path Goal Theory: Kristy Vigilante

Path-Goal Theory- leader uses a leadership style that matches the worker’s motivational needs in a particular situation.

§  Developed in the early 1970’s by Robert House, a professor of organizational studies and management at the University of Pennsylvania.
§  Leader behaviors depend on two situational factors: the subordinate conditions and the task characteristics.
§  House & Mitchell examined four leader behaviors that meet directive, supportive, participative, and achievement oriented needs; these behaviors help workers avoid obstacles while moving along the path toward the goal:

ü  Directive-oriented leadership: leader clearly directs, instructs, and monitors workers in the time, quality, and expectations for how the task is to be accomplished

ü  Supportive-orientated leadership: leader takes genuine interest in the workers’ well being and their working conditions.

ü  Participative-oriented leadership: leader consults and shares information with the group to obtain their input into the decision-making process as a means to implement a superior solution.

ü  Achievement-oriented leadership: leader expresses challenging goals with a high standard for excellent performance.


Path-Goal Theory in Practice

§  Purpose: increase worker effort, performance, and job satisfaction in each situation.

 
 


§  Path-Goal Theory into Practice Table 4-3 identifies a situation, the specific leadership behavior recommended according to the path-goal theory, the impact of this leadership behavior on the follower, and the outcome.

o   Directive leadership: followers prefer authoritarian leadership, task is complex and ambiguous, & the rules and regulations are unclear about how to complete the task.

o   Supportive leadership: followers lack self-confidence and need affiliation and support; task is menial, boring, and repetitive.

o   Achievement-oriented leadership: followers have high expectations and a need for task accomplishment; task is complex, ambiguous, and challenging (or it may have a lack of challenge).

o   Participative leadership: followers have a high level of competence, cooperation, and a need to excel; task may be unclear or unstructured and the reward may not be appropriate to the goal.


v  Workers with a high level of internal locus of control (those who believe their outcomes are a result of their own hard work and good decisions) tend to be more satisfied working with leaders who use participative leadership styles.

v  Workers with a high level of external locus of control (those who see outcomes as a result of external factors or luck) tend to be more satisfied working with leaders using directive leadership styles.

v  Educational leaders should be able to apply the path-goal theory by assessing the needs of the school workers and the particular situation and then apply the correct leadership style.

v  Path-goal theory allows school leaders to increase the probability of increased worker effort, performance, and job satisfaction, as well as build staff capacity to confront and solve new tasks.

No comments:

Post a Comment